Room for Peace

12 and 15 September 1978 · About 3 minutes

Before the ending: two documents from Camp David

Read before jumping to the signing photograph. What could someone inside the room know while the outcome was still uncertain?

Choices stay on this page. No score, saved answers or submissions.

Context

Sources for this context

Evidence

12 September: the ambassador's report

In our words, not a quotation

Ambassador Samuel Lewis reported that Moshe Dayan saw little prospect of continuing and spoke of plans to leave the next day. Lewis urged them to stay for another draft.

A short passage from the English original

Dayan seemed convinced that there was little left now to do but close out the conference.

Who describes the pessimism: Dayan writing, or someone who spoke with him?

Open the source: FRUS 1977⁠–⁠1980, Volume IX, Second Revised Edition, Document 45: Memorandum of ConversationU.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian · 1978-09-12

15 September: the mediator's letter

In our words, not a quotation

Carter proposed a working sequence to Begin and Sadat: recommendations on Friday, drafting on Saturday, and a Sunday conclusion with a joint press statement.

A short passage from the English original

that tomorrow (Saturday) be devoted to drafting efforts

Does the letter set out the compromise itself, or a way to keep working?

Open the source: FRUS 1977⁠–⁠1980, Volume IX, Second Revised Edition, Document 51: Letter From President Carter to Egyptian President Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister BeginU.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian · 1978-09-15

Your answer

Which conclusion do the two documents support?

All choices and explanations
Fear of failure was recorded; a working sequence was later proposed to conclude the talks.
Yes. We can trace an assessment and a practical proposal. Explaining why agreement followed requires more evidence.
By 12 September everyone knew the agreement would be signed.
The report about Dayan does not support that. It also cannot tell us what every participant thought.
Carter's letter proves that he alone saved the summit.
The letter records a proposal. Explaining the breakthrough requires other participants' decisions and responses too.

What next

A question to take away: What would you look for in the next document to tell whether something substantive changed?

What did the two frameworks cover?

List the Sinai provisions separately from the proposed West Bank–Gaza arrangements.

More ways to explore

All activities

Content was checked against the linked sources. Translations used AI assistance; a classroom pilot and human Arabic/English language-editor review have not yet taken place.